Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Lance Briggs ???


Ten questions about a Lance Briggs trade:


1. Didn't we just dump a player who was a poor fit in Gregg Williams defense? Lance Briggs played in Chicago's Tampa-2 defense with a 3-4 alignment. Would he be the second coming of Adam in Washington?


2. Sure he can tackle. Can he stop the run?


3. Lance Briggs and how many draft choices? Initial reports said Chicago will send Briggs and its first round selection (31st overall). That's it?


4. Briggs is young, at least. His productivity might be concurrent with his contract, unlike the thirty-somethings the Redskins often bring in whose serviceability is less than the term of their deal. How will the men of Ashburn structure Briggs' contract so that they can get out if he turns out to be the second coming of Adam? How will that money affect the Skins ability to restock the team later this decade? Do fans want Briggs if he costs us Sean Taylor at the end of his contract?


5. If Briggs is unhappy with franchise player money ($7.4 Million in 2007), how much will it take to make him happy? How will he feel when asked to restructure his contract next season? The Redskins are thought to be over the 2008 salary cap already. They need team guys willing to be flexible on their contracts for the inevitable restructure.


6. Do the men of Ashburn expect the fans to be excited by this move? Initial comments on The Warpath and ExtremeSkins message boards are highly skeptical (I'm being polite.)


7. Is Marcus Washington recovering on schedule? My negative attitude will change completely if Washington will miss significant time this season.


8. Have the coaches given up on Rocky McIntosh, because that's what this move is saying? For that matter, are the Redskins, with the league's oldest staff, any good at assessing and coaching young talent? 8a: Have the coaches given up on Lemar Marshall, too?


9. Is linebacker the area of greatest need on the defense? Wouldn't it be better (smarter) to trade our number one pick for a lineman who can bring pass rushing pressure? Then, we could apply the lower pick on an offensive guard or cornerback.


10. Whatever happened to that Dre' Bly trade idea? That made much more sense. Is it off the table? With Briggs, we seem to be solving a problem we do not have.


BONUS Question, held in reserve until a Briggs deal comes to pass: Can we fire the owner?



I have to say it (close your eye kiddies). If this deal goes through, Lance Briggs and Drew Rosenhaus are tools, and Snyder is their bitch.



2 comments:

Hank said...

I agree completely with your logic, particuarly as this move would pertain to the development of McIntosh. Thankfully, there are some indications that this trade report may be merely a smokescreen by Rosenhaus in an attempt to stir up market chatter for Briggs, at least according to Clark Judge on CBSsportsline.

Anonymous said...

Hey Snyder, get some ROI for a change. If you sign Briggs, pay him $10 million a year less 100K for each missed tackle. Bear Fan